How do?Bomber wrote:Then comment is irrelevant.
I said I didn't trust the report not that it wasn't true. Basic investigative skills teach you to not give much weight to reports with bias in them.
Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, ruud, Judge Judy, Forum Admins
How do?Bomber wrote:Then comment is irrelevant.
So you know the source of swanny's "report" and therefore connect this so-called bias?God is an Englishman wrote:How do?Bomber wrote:Then comment is irrelevant.
I said I didn't trust the report not that it wasn't true. Basic investigative skills teach you to not give much weight to reports with bias in them.
If they called it "best on ground" then yes, I believe there was some bias.Bomber wrote:So you know the source of swanny's "report" and therefore connect this so-called bias?God is an Englishman wrote:How do?Bomber wrote:Then comment is irrelevant.
I said I didn't trust the report not that it wasn't true. Basic investigative skills teach you to not give much weight to reports with bias in them.
He may have been but clearly the report is biased.Bomber wrote:How do you know he wasn't (best on ground)?
442 gave him man of the matchGod is an Englishman wrote:How do?Bomber wrote:Then comment is irrelevant.
I said I didn't trust the report not that it wasn't true. Basic investigative skills teach you to not give much weight to reports with bias in them.
English 442 or Australian 442?Brian the Postman wrote:442 gave him man of the matchGod is an Englishman wrote:How do?Bomber wrote:Then comment is irrelevant.
I said I didn't trust the report not that it wasn't true. Basic investigative skills teach you to not give much weight to reports with bias in them.
What's the difference?God is an Englishman wrote:English 442 or Australian 442?Brian the Postman wrote:442 gave him man of the matchGod is an Englishman wrote: How do?
I said I didn't trust the report not that it wasn't true. Basic investigative skills teach you to not give much weight to reports with bias in them.
And it becomes more trustworthy anyway as they didn't call him "best on ground"
One is Australian and the other is English - I thought that was obvious,Brian the Postman wrote:What's the difference?
Are you suggesting that there were women playing in the game?
Yes that is obvious (that's why I wasn't questioning it), what's the difference between man of the match and best on ground?God is an Englishman wrote:One is Australian and the other is English - I thought that was obvious,Brian the Postman wrote:What's the difference?
Are you suggesting that there were women playing in the game?
No, no women playing as far as I know.
One shows the report was written by an Australian.Brian the Postman wrote:Yes that is obvious (that's why I wasn't questioning it), what's the difference between man of the match and best on ground?God is an Englishman wrote:One is Australian and the other is English - I thought that was obvious,Brian the Postman wrote:What's the difference?
Are you suggesting that there were women playing in the game?
No, no women playing as far as I know.
My initial comment was an interpretation of a report....not sure if it said Man of The Match, Best on Ground, Best Player....was based on many comments in a twiiter feed...God is an Englishman wrote: One shows the report was written by an Australian.
How can you trust the report, there is a Millwall player in there.pernunz wrote:http://www.efl.com/news/article/2016/sk ... 33413.aspx
Can't see any bias in there.Brian the Postman wrote:How can you trust the report, there is a Millwall player in there.pernunz wrote:http://www.efl.com/news/article/2016/sk ... 33413.aspx
It originally was about League One.swannsong wrote:I thought this thread was about the Championship....not League One :?
But it's not now !Abenomics wrote:It originally was about League One.swannsong wrote:I thought this thread was about the Championship....not League One :?
Norwich 0 Owls 0 , sad to here Forestieri spat the dummy over club knocking back offer from Derby.swannsong wrote:Back on topic...
Newcastle United ( 1 ) Huddersfield Town ( 2 )
Although beaten by Man City the fact that this bunch of idiots have spent 45 million to be bottom of the championship is so good, how long before Rafa Beneathus boltspernunz wrote:http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/ ... ld_Town_2/
pernunz wrote:http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/ ... ld_Town_2/
NORTHERN ECHO wrote:"MAN OF THE MATCH: Aaron Mooy – the Australian midfielder made life difficult for Newcastle by breaking things up and protecting the visiting defence. "
Can we trust the Northern Echo? Is this an Aussie rag?swannsong wrote:pernunz wrote:http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/ ... ld_Town_2/NORTHERN ECHO wrote:"MAN OF THE MATCH: Aaron Mooy – the Australian midfielder made life difficult for Newcastle by breaking things up and protecting the visiting defence. "
No, it's a northern English rag. More trustworthy than an Aussie paper, not as good as the Evening Standard though.Bomber wrote:Can we trust the Northern Echo? Is this an Aussie rag?swannsong wrote:pernunz wrote:http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/ ... ld_Town_2/NORTHERN ECHO wrote:"MAN OF THE MATCH: Aaron Mooy – the Australian midfielder made life difficult for Newcastle by breaking things up and protecting the visiting defence. "
Nevertheless, good to see Newcastle lose and hang near the bottom with Leeds.
But not as bad as the Chronicle which may as well be NUFC fanzine.God is an Englishman wrote:No, it's a northern English rag. More trustworthy than an Aussie paper, not as good as the Evening Standard though.