Australia v Pakistan
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60447
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Australia v Pakistan
Hard to call, but can't see us losing the series. Pakistan can either be brilliant or totally crap - depends on which one turns up.
Australia unsettled (batting line up, including opening spot) so could be closer than normal.
Australia unsettled (batting line up, including opening spot) so could be closer than normal.
Ignore this signature
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Pakistan to win in upset they seem to have better balanced team
I may not be perfect but I'm still the closest I have ever come across
- Michael
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2052
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:14 pm
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Australia Test squad: David Warner, Joe Burns, Marnus Labuschagne, Steve Smith, Cameron Bancroft, Travis Head, Matthew Wade, Tim Paine (c,wk), Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood, Nathan Lyon, Mitchell Starc, James Pattinson, Michael Neser.
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 6:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Pattinson, Neser and Bancroft to miss out on 1st test.Michael wrote:Australia Test squad: David Warner, Joe Burns, Marnus Labuschagne, Steve Smith, Cameron Bancroft, Travis Head, Matthew Wade, Tim Paine (c,wk), Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood, Nathan Lyon, Mitchell Starc, James Pattinson, Michael Neser.
WHO TOOK MY TV GUIDE???
- Michael
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2052
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:14 pm
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Frank Costanza wrote:Pattinson, Neser and Bancroft to miss out on 1st test.Michael wrote:Australia Test squad: David Warner, Joe Burns, Marnus Labuschagne, Steve Smith, Cameron Bancroft, Travis Head, Matthew Wade, Tim Paine (c,wk), Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood, Nathan Lyon, Mitchell Starc, James Pattinson, Michael Neser.
You would think, but I think Neser/Pattinson may nick a spot in front of Starc
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 6:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Agreed plus his record in Oz with the faster wickets and extra bounce is exceptional.Bomber wrote:I'd pick Starc in front of them. Left arm option plus footmarks for Lyon to bowl into.
WHO TOOK MY TV GUIDE???
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Pakistan win toss and bat and good start so far for them
I may not be perfect but I'm still the closest I have ever come across
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
two quick wickets and now 2 for 75
I may not be perfect but I'm still the closest I have ever come across
- Okinotorishima
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 12:09 pm
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 6:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 16 times
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60447
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Haven't been watching but has there been any hint of the Pakistani bowlers trying to replicate how Broad bowled to him?Frank Costanza wrote:Warner the flat track bully at it again
Ignore this signature
-
- Coach
- Posts: 21829
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 215 times
- Been thanked: 51 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
0/195 at tea off 51 overs very slow over rate that means 39 overs to be bowled in last session.Bomber wrote:Haven't been watching but has there been any hint of the Pakistani bowlers trying to replicate how Broad bowled to him?Frank Costanza wrote:Warner the flat track bully at it again
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
namesake gets his ton more than his whole ashes series lol
I may not be perfect but I'm still the closest I have ever come across
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60447
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
No different to Root and at least this time the third umpire had the balls to make the right call. Therefore no unfair advantage, so no big deal.God is an Englishman wrote:"aussies" cheating again.
Even bomber has to admit that one.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Bomber wrote:No different to Root and at least this time the third umpire had the balls to make the right call. Therefore no unfair advantage, so no big deal.God is an Englishman wrote:"aussies" cheating again.
Even bomber has to admit that one.
Are you going to call him a cheat?
Completely different to Root's. Root caught it, you may feel he didn't but it's debatable. This one isn't.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60447
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
It touched grass just like Root's. At least I can see it. You had that specsavers appointment yet? I mean for the other eye.God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:No different to Root and at least this time the third umpire had the balls to make the right call. Therefore no unfair advantage, so no big deal.God is an Englishman wrote:"aussies" cheating again.
Even bomber has to admit that one.
Are you going to call him a cheat?
Completely different to Root's. Root caught it, you may feel he didn't but it's debatable. This one isn't.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
root is more a cheat as he got away with his lol , but all cabernet aside I think they both thought they caught it so neither are real cheats not like warner and co
I may not be perfect but I'm still the closest I have ever come across
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
In that case, warner, bosnich, warne, sailor, armstrong, johnson aren't that bad either as they got caught.Dave now from No 9 wrote:root is more a cheat as he got away with his lol , but all cabernet aside I think they both thought they caught it so neither are real cheats not like warner and co
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Bomber wrote:I'll consider it once you can admit same about Root.God is an Englishman wrote:Are you going to call him a cheat?
So, you're a hypocrite then. You'll call an opposition player a cheat but you won't call an "aussie" one when you believe they have done the same thing.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60447
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
So you're admitting they did the same thing? Then great. He's a cheat (that didn't get away with anything) and Root's a cheat that did get away with something.God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:I'll consider it once you can admit same about Root.God is an Englishman wrote:Are you going to call him a cheat?
So, you're a hypocrite then. You'll call an opposition player a cheat but you won't call an "aussie" one when you believe they have done the same thing.
Ignore this signature