EPL 22/23

[Nicky Tanner]

C'mon Leicester, Spurs and Bournemouth.

Two out of three ain't bad,

[Nice One Cyril]

Is it a fixed number of seats or a percentage of the capacity?

I think it's 10% with a minimum of 3,000. So for clubs with small stadia, that's a good chunk of their seating.

[Bomber]

C'mon Leicester, Spurs and Bournemouth.

Two out of three ain't bad,

Leeds going down was the most preferred (for me).

[Nice One Cyril]

C'mon Leicester, Spurs and Bournemouth.

Two out of three ain't bad,

Leeds going down was the most preferred (for me).

Happy days.

Spurs win, but avoid the dreaded wanky conference thing, and dirty Leeds go down.

[haywood djablowme]

C'mon Leicester, Spurs and Bournemouth.

Two out of three ain't bad,

Leeds going down was the most preferred (for me).

Happy days.

Spurs win, but avoid the dreaded wanky conference thing, and dirty Leeds go down.

So there was a positive from the Spuds season then..

[Nice One Cyril]

C'mon Leicester, Spurs and Bournemouth.

Two out of three ain't bad,

Leeds going down was the most preferred (for me).

Happy days.

Spurs win, but avoid the dreaded wanky conference thing, and dirty Leeds go down.

So there was a positive from the Spuds season then..

Yep, that was a highlight

A rebuild needed so I'm not expecting much for the next couple of seasons tbh, hopefully Arsenal do a Leicester, have one good season and then go down in the next five years.

[Nice One Cyril]

Also a positive that Jug Ears Lineker's team went down as well, I can't stand that champagne socialist, sanctimonious twat

[Bodø Glimt]

Happy days.
Spurs win, but avoid the dreaded wanky conference thing,

You may have missed out on a trip to Bodø.

[Bomber]

Happy days.
Spurs win, but avoid the dreaded wanky conference thing,

You may have missed out on a trip to Bodø.

Win/win.

[God is an Englishman]

C'mon Leicester, Spurs and Bournemouth.

Two out of three ain't bad,

Leeds going down was the most preferred (for me).

Oh please let us have Leeds while I am home.

[Victoria's Secret]

C'mon Leicester, Spurs and Bournemouth.

Two out of three ain't bad,

Leeds going down was the most preferred (for me).

Happy days.

Spurs win, but avoid the dreaded wanky conference thing, and dirty Leeds go down.

So there was a positive from the Spuds season then..

Yep, that was a highlight

A rebuild needed so I'm not expecting much for the next couple of seasons tbh, hopefully Arsenal do a Leicester, have one good season and then go down in the next five years.

you havent done much for 15 years?

[Bomber]

Pochettino to Chelski. The clock is ticking.

[Nice One Cyril]

you havent done much for 15 years?

They've always been the poorest out of the Big 6, that's just the way it is. They get second dibs on players after the bigger clubs have had their bite, but the reality is that their recruitment under Steve Hitchin has been largely abysmal, now gone. We mostly wasted the money we got for Bale, and have mostly wasted the best years of Harry Kane. Who's to blame? I can't say I have any idea about the internal workings of the club, but the buck generally stops at the top.

Levy has built them a world class stadium and they're on a sound financial footing, but I'm suspicious that he gets involved in stuff he knows sweet FA about.

[Victoria's Secret]

this table wouldn't lie.....


https://www.squawka.com/en/premier-leag ... d-2022-23/

(I hate net spend - so dont think I agree or care with any of it)

[Nice One Cyril]

this table wouldn't lie.....


https://www.squawka.com/en/premier-leag ... d-2022-23/

(I hate net spend - so dont think I agree or care with any of it)

Net spend is the only meaningful way to express expenditure. I'm sure if there was a table for net spend in the last 15 seasons, Spurs would be well down the list and most of those they did splurge big on were bang average players. Whomever looked at them playing and thought they were worth big money was a poor judge.

EDIT: Just found a 20 year net spend and Spurs were eighth, where they finished this season.

[Raich Carter]

this table wouldn't lie.....


https://www.squawka.com/en/premier-leag ... d-2022-23/

(I hate net spend - so dont think I agree or care with any of it)

Net spend is the only meaningful way to express expenditure. I'm sure if there was a table for net spend in the last 15 seasons, Spurs would be well down the list and most of those they did splurge big on were bang average players. Whomever looked at them playing and thought they were worth big money was a poor judge.

EDIT: Just found a 20 year net spend and Spurs were eighth, where they finished this season.

Net spend is bollocks - you could sell your mercedes and buy 6 trabants and have a great net spend but have to deal with the dross you bought.

[Nice One Cyril]

this table wouldn't lie.....


https://www.squawka.com/en/premier-leag ... d-2022-23/

(I hate net spend - so dont think I agree or care with any of it)

Net spend is the only meaningful way to express expenditure. I'm sure if there was a table for net spend in the last 15 seasons, Spurs would be well down the list and most of those they did splurge big on were bang average players. Whomever looked at them playing and thought they were worth big money was a poor judge.

EDIT: Just found a 20 year net spend and Spurs were eighth, where they finished this season.

Net spend is bollocks - you could sell your mercedes and buy 6 trabants and have a great net spend but have to deal with the dross you bought.

Not really, you cannot spend money you don't have, so net spend is important, unless of course you are an oil Sheikh. Your point about what you do with that net spend is another argument altogether.

PS You must be chuffed that the Geordies are doing so well

[Raich Carter]

this table wouldn't lie.....


https://www.squawka.com/en/premier-leag ... d-2022-23/

(I hate net spend - so dont think I agree or care with any of it)

Net spend is the only meaningful way to express expenditure. I'm sure if there was a table for net spend in the last 15 seasons, Spurs would be well down the list and most of those they did splurge big on were bang average players. Whomever looked at them playing and thought they were worth big money was a poor judge.

EDIT: Just found a 20 year net spend and Spurs were eighth, where they finished this season.

Net spend is bollocks - you could sell your mercedes and buy 6 trabants and have a great net spend but have to deal with the dross you bought.

Not really, you cannot spend money you don't have, so net spend is important, unless of course you are an oil Sheikh. Your point about what you do with that net spend is another argument altogether.

PS You must be chuffed that the Geordies are doing so well

Will always have an asterisk against anything it achieves while it is "Project Saud".

[God is an Englishman]

this table wouldn't lie.....


https://www.squawka.com/en/premier-leag ... d-2022-23/

(I hate net spend - so dont think I agree or care with any of it)

Net spend is the only meaningful way to express expenditure. I'm sure if there was a table for net spend in the last 15 seasons, Spurs would be well down the list and most of those they did splurge big on were bang average players. Whomever looked at them playing and thought they were worth big money was a poor judge.

EDIT: Just found a 20 year net spend and Spurs were eighth, where they finished this season.

Net spend is bollocks - you could sell your mercedes and buy 6 trabants and have a great net spend but have to deal with the dross you bought.

Not really, you cannot spend money you don't have, so net spend is important, unless of course you are an oil Sheikh. Your point about what you do with that net spend is another argument altogether.

PS You must be chuffed that the Geordies are doing so well

Will always have an asterisk against anything it achieves while it is "Project Saud".

Bitter?

[Raich Carter]

this table wouldn't lie.....


https://www.squawka.com/en/premier-leag ... d-2022-23/

(I hate net spend - so dont think I agree or care with any of it)

Net spend is the only meaningful way to express expenditure. I'm sure if there was a table for net spend in the last 15 seasons, Spurs would be well down the list and most of those they did splurge big on were bang average players. Whomever looked at them playing and thought they were worth big money was a poor judge.

EDIT: Just found a 20 year net spend and Spurs were eighth, where they finished this season.

Net spend is bollocks - you could sell your mercedes and buy 6 trabants and have a great net spend but have to deal with the dross you bought.

Not really, you cannot spend money you don't have, so net spend is important, unless of course you are an oil Sheikh. Your point about what you do with that net spend is another argument altogether.

PS You must be chuffed that the Geordies are doing so well

Will always have an asterisk against anything it achieves while it is "Project Saud".

Bitter?

No, they are just an odious lot who seem to have some sense that they entitled to be some power in football. They haven't won anything for 70yrs. FTM.

[God is an Englishman]

Net spend is the only meaningful way to express expenditure. I'm sure if there was a table for net spend in the last 15 seasons, Spurs would be well down the list and most of those they did splurge big on were bang average players. Whomever looked at them playing and thought they were worth big money was a poor judge.

EDIT: Just found a 20 year net spend and Spurs were eighth, where they finished this season.

Net spend is bollocks - you could sell your mercedes and buy 6 trabants and have a great net spend but have to deal with the dross you bought.

Not really, you cannot spend money you don't have, so net spend is important, unless of course you are an oil Sheikh. Your point about what you do with that net spend is another argument altogether.

PS You must be chuffed that the Geordies are doing so well

Will always have an asterisk against anything it achieves while it is "Project Saud".

Bitter?

No, they are just an odious lot who seem to have some sense that they entitled to be some power in football. They haven't won anything for 70yrs. FTM.

So why care who their owners are?

Personally, I find it funny how they talk about football in the NE being so passionate. Not seen that when I've been up there. Everyone forgets the crap crowds they used to get.

[Nice One Cyril]

Personally, I find it funny how they talk about football in the NE being so passionate. Not seen that when I've been up there. Everyone forgets the crap crowds they used to get.

The Monkey Hangers vs Millwall was never going to draw a big crowd

[God is an Englishman]

Personally, I find it funny how they talk about football in the NE being so passionate. Not seen that when I've been up there. Everyone forgets the crap crowds they used to get.

The Monkey Hangers vs Millwall was never going to draw a big crowd

Never been there. Been to St James's, Ayersome and Roker though.

[Bodø Glimt]

Happy days.
Spurs win, but avoid the dreaded wanky conference thing,

You may have missed out on a trip to Bodø.

Win/win.

Reminds me our games against Celtic.

[eagleboy]

Could this happen


Celtic boss Ange Postecoglou 'set' for Tottenham Hotspur face-to-face talks with Daniel Levy on Monday


https://www.footballscotland.co.uk/spfl ... t-27040453

https://videocelts.com/2023/06/blogs/la ... ges-agent/

[eagleboy]

Next Leeds manager odds: Daniel Farke clear favourite for the role

That a great name for a Football manager. I wonder what his nickname is.

https://www.sportinglife.com/football/n ... ole/209801

[theorakle]

glazers will only sell to whoever will give the most money FACT,

[God is an Englishman]

glazers will only sell to whoever will give the most money FACT,

If you were selling your house. Would you sell to the highest bidder or the 2nd highest bidder?

[theorakle]

glazers will only sell to whoever will give the most money FACT,

If you were selling your house. Would you sell to the highest bidder or the 2nd highest bidder?

i cannot argue with that giae but my circumstances were very different, i didnt make myself fabulously rich by robbing man u for over a decade like the crooked glazers did, i pray they sell to the sheik who will get them out quicksmart and a million other man u fans will agree with me,

[thebeautifulgame]

glazers will only sell to whoever will give the most money FACT,

If you were selling your house. Would you sell to the highest bidder or the 2nd highest bidder?

Depends...............if it was in Seaford there would only be a dollar difference!

I'm sure theorakle would sell it to the family who needed it the most, even if he was down a dollar.