Darren Bent

[Hawkseys Double]

in the end the guy scores goals thats all there is to it where ever he is he puts the ball in the net

and to the tottenham fans he may not be a better player then defoe but as it stands he is a better goal scorer

Yes of course. But I'd rather have the player who does more for the team over a player who just scores goals. Defoe provides more than Bent and still scores goals.

[El Capitano]

in the end the guy scores goals thats all there is to it where ever he is he puts the ball in the net

and to the tottenham fans he may not be a better player then defoe but as it stands he is a better goal scorer

Yes of course. But I'd rather have the player who does more for the team over a player who just scores goals. Defoe provides more than Bent and still scores goals.

What does Defoe provide besides goals?

[BTAC]

in the end the guy scores goals thats all there is to it where ever he is he puts the ball in the net

and to the tottenham fans he may not be a better player then defoe but as it stands he is a better goal scorer

Yes of course. But I'd rather have the player who does more for the team over a player who just scores goals. Defoe provides more than Bent and still scores goals.

What does Defoe provide besides goals?

Stop being lazy. Watch a Spurs game and find out for yourself.

[El Capitano]

Stop being lazy. Watch a Spurs game and find out for yourself.

One win for Liverpool and your back to sticking your nose where it doesn't belong.

Go away now, your boring.

[BTAC]

Stop being lazy. Watch a Spurs game and find out for yourself.

One win for Liverpool and your back to sticking your nose where it doesn't belong.

Go away now, your boring.

Yes because your nose belongs in a Darren Bent topic does it?

Get over yourself, you aren't that hot.

[El Capitano]

Go away now, your boring.

[BTAC]

Go away now, your boring.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDdZlSsxbOQ&feature=fvst

0:16

[Hawkseys Double]

in the end the guy scores goals thats all there is to it where ever he is he puts the ball in the net

and to the tottenham fans he may not be a better player then defoe but as it stands he is a better goal scorer

Yes of course. But I'd rather have the player who does more for the team over a player who just scores goals. Defoe provides more than Bent and still scores goals.

What does Defoe provide besides goals?

Defoe drags out players to make it easier for Bale and Van Der Vaart to penetrate the opposition defense. Bent does not do this, Defoe also makes runs close to the line to assist with the wing play, again Bent does not do this.

[predator]

Defoe drags out players to make it easier for Bale and Van Der Vaart to penetrate the opposition defense. Bent does not do this, Defoe also makes runs close to the line to assist with the wing play, again Bent does not do this.

Might do all that, but he's still only an average player

[BTAC]

Defoe drags out players to make it easier for Bale and Van Der Vaart to penetrate the opposition defense. Bent does not do this, Defoe also makes runs close to the line to assist with the wing play, again Bent does not do this.

Might do all that, but he's still only an average player

:?

[SPURS18]

Defoe drags out players to make it easier for Bale and Van Der Vaart to penetrate the opposition defense. Bent does not do this, Defoe also makes runs close to the line to assist with the wing play, again Bent does not do this.

Might do all that, but he's still only an average player

your a

[BTAC]

Defoe drags out players to make it easier for Bale and Van Der Vaart to penetrate the opposition defense. Bent does not do this, Defoe also makes runs close to the line to assist with the wing play, again Bent does not do this.

Might do all that, but he's still only an average player

your a

If this were Facebook, I'd like this comment.

[The one and only]

like i said i wasnt saying bent was better than defoe just a better out and out goal scorer

[BTAC]

like i said i wasnt saying bent was better than defoe just a better out and out goal scorer

He definitely is. Bent's a great scorer.

But if I had to choose from Defoe and Bent to have in my side, it'd be Defoe all day long. Much better overall footballer.

[Hawkseys Double]

like i said i wasnt saying bent was better than defoe just a better out and out goal scorer

He definitely is. Bent's a great scorer.

But if I had to choose from Defoe and Bent to have in my side, it'd be Defoe all day long. Much better overall footballer.

Bingo. This is why I leap out of bed to read Bow Ties comments, because he actually understands the game.

When we had Bent, he provided little up front, he scored goals, but don't expect him to play back to goal, play the wings or 1-2's with other players.

[El Capitano]

like i said i wasnt saying bent was better than defoe just a better out and out goal scorer

He definitely is. Bent's a great scorer.

But if I had to choose from Defoe and Bent to have in my side, it'd be Defoe all day long. Much better overall footballer.

Yeah picking the injury prone striker (of late) with a lesser scoring rate is the sensible option.

As for your link, what makes you think I'm gonna open it?

[Nice One Cyril]

picking the injury prone striker (of late) with a lesser scoring rate is the sensible option.

Off the top of my head, nearly every EPL player I can think of that went to the WC, has either been injured, out of form, or both, since they came back.

[BTAC]

like i said i wasnt saying bent was better than defoe just a better out and out goal scorer

He definitely is. Bent's a great scorer.

But if I had to choose from Defoe and Bent to have in my side, it'd be Defoe all day long. Much better overall footballer.

Yeah picking the injury prone striker (of late) with a lesser scoring rate is the sensible option.

As for your link, what makes you think I'm gonna open it?

Yeah, my bad. Defoe's stats aren't as impressive. What was I thinking?

I really couldn't give a toss if you open it or not. The fact is I win.

[Hawkseys Double]

Yeah picking the injury prone striker (of late) with a lesser scoring rate is the sensible option.

As for your link, what makes you think I'm gonna open it?

Yeah, my bad. Defoe's stats aren't as impressive. What was I thinking?

I really couldn't give a toss if you open it or not. The fact is I win.

El Capitano, so what he has had a tough season. Every other season he has been rather reliable.

[BTAC]

Yeah picking the injury prone striker (of late) with a lesser scoring rate is the sensible option.

As for your link, what makes you think I'm gonna open it?

Yeah, my bad. Defoe's stats aren't as impressive. What was I thinking?

I really couldn't give a toss if you open it or not. The fact is I win.

El Capitano, so what he has had a tough season. Every other season he has been rather reliable.

Only Rooney is allowed a rough patch. Duh.

[Hawkseys Double]

Oh how could I forget excuse me. I guess Berbatov is the best striker in the world now.

[BTAC]

Oh how could I forget excuse me. I guess Berbatov is the best striker in the world now.

Does it even need to be said?

[El Capitano]

Yeah, my bad. Defoe's stats aren't as impressive. What was I thinking?

You finally admit you were wrong. Wasn't so hard was it?

[El Capitano]

Oh how could I forget excuse me. I guess Berbatov is the best striker in the world now.

Best in the world is debatable. But best in the EPL? Yes.

[BTAC]

Yeah, my bad. Defoe's stats aren't as impressive. What was I thinking?

You finally admit you were wrong. Wasn't so hard was it?

Nope. Hopefully I'll learn from this and become a better person.

[Hawkseys Double]

Oh how could I forget excuse me. I guess Berbatov is the best striker in the world now.

Best in the world is debatable. But best in the EPL? Yes.

Best in the world? No way.

Best in the EPL? This season yes. Other seasons, absolutely not.

[BTAC]

Oh how could I forget excuse me. I guess Berbatov is the best striker in the world now.

Best in the world is debatable. But best in the EPL? Yes.

Best in the world? No way.

Best in the EPL? This season yes. Other seasons, absolutely not.

He's only best in the EPL this season because every other world class striker in the league has been cack. Torres, Drogba and Rooney have all been underwhelming this season, so Berbatov's good run of form has come at a good time.

[Hawkseys Double]

Spot on Bow Ties.

[paul merson]

in the end the guy scores goals thats all there is to it where ever he is he puts the ball in the net

and to the tottenham fans he may not be a better player then defoe but as it stands he is a better goal scorer

Yes of course. But I'd rather have the player who does more for the team over a player who just scores goals. Defoe provides more than Bent and still scores goals.

Villa needed a goal scorer, so they bought one, I dont understand what all the fuss is over.

If Randy Lerner is happy to cough up 24 mill then Bent is worth 24 mill to him.

[The Kop]

Randy gets all the credit for not being afraid to loosen the purse strings.

But really isn't that just the unspent Milner money from Sheikh Mohammed?
All evens out in the end.