England cricket team lol

[C U Next Saturday]

Bradman missed the first test due to illness,

In the second test Bradman scored 103 not out in the second innings to lead Australia to their only win in the series.

Larwood never played another test after Bodyline

[Cooper]

Oh the irony.

Lost count how many times youve dodged and deflected showing proof of your claims.

Still yet to see any evidence of what you have claimed. Should be pretty simple for you to get and back up your opinions.

Not once have you ever beaten me

Twice today alone

You have been given the eye witnesses and they've even been referenced.

"I'd rather leave Brisbane with 2 ducks than 2 broken ribs". Guess which coward said that?

Haha maybe in your own mind but we all know that doesnt count.

Where? Ive seen no link to anything which you have claimed, your opinion and words me nothing as usual. You would make a terrible lawyer, but judge i said so, so thats evidence enough.

Probably yourself id say.

Both are obvious.

In Quest of the Ashes by DR Jardine. It's a thing called a book, have you ever read one?

Yes obviously that you lost, glad you agree.

Yes

Your best argument is "I know I am but what are you". No wonder showing you up isn't even a challenge.

Read that book for all your evidence.

4th time - How many runs did Bradman score in the first test of 32/33 series?

Say the "cause I said so" man lol

It doesn't matter if you agree or not, all others can see you get beaten time and time again by many on here, it's very funny.

Who knows how many times, provide your evidence then we can go from there.

Edit seems like you have your answer above.

[Cooper]

Could be suggested that the body line tactics used by England were cowardly as they had to attack the player and not play the game. Probably knew they'd struggle to win without those tactics.

[God is an Englishman]

Bradman missed the first test due to illness,

In the second test Bradman scored 103 not out in the second innings to lead Australia to their only win in the series.

Larwood never played another test after Bodyline

Illness - care to expand on that?

[God is an Englishman]

Could be suggested that the body line tactics used by England were cowardly as they had to attack the player and not play the game. Probably knew they'd struggle to win without those tactics.

Could be suggested, would be wrong though. Aussies also know this as they laud similar tactics now. Leg Theory was actually used first by an australian side. Strange the aussies don't know about that one.

[God is an Englishman]

Twice today alone

You have been given the eye witnesses and they've even been referenced.

"I'd rather leave Brisbane with 2 ducks than 2 broken ribs". Guess which coward said that?

Haha maybe in your own mind but we all know that doesnt count.

Where? Ive seen no link to anything which you have claimed, your opinion and words me nothing as usual. You would make a terrible lawyer, but judge i said so, so thats evidence enough.

Probably yourself id say.

Both are obvious.

In Quest of the Ashes by DR Jardine. It's a thing called a book, have you ever read one?

Yes obviously that you lost, glad you agree.

Yes

Your best argument is "I know I am but what are you". No wonder showing you up isn't even a challenge.

Read that book for all your evidence.

4th time - How many runs did Bradman score in the first test of 32/33 series?

Say the "cause I said so" man lol

It doesn't matter if you agree or not, all others can see you get beaten time and time again by many on here, it's very funny.

Who knows how many times, provide your evidence then we can go from there.

Edit seems like you have your answer above.

5th time - How many runs did Bradman score in the first test of the 32/33 series?

[Cooper]

Haha maybe in your own mind but we all know that doesnt count.

Where? Ive seen no link to anything which you have claimed, your opinion and words me nothing as usual. You would make a terrible lawyer, but judge i said so, so thats evidence enough.

Probably yourself id say.

Both are obvious.

In Quest of the Ashes by DR Jardine. It's a thing called a book, have you ever read one?

Yes obviously that you lost, glad you agree.

Yes

Your best argument is "I know I am but what are you". No wonder showing you up isn't even a challenge.

Read that book for all your evidence.

4th time - How many runs did Bradman score in the first test of 32/33 series?

Say the "cause I said so" man lol

It doesn't matter if you agree or not, all others can see you get beaten time and time again by many on here, it's very funny.

Who knows how many times, provide your evidence then we can go from there.

Edit seems like you have your answer above.

5th time - How many runs did Bradman score in the first test of the 32/33 series?

You literally replied to the comment with the answer to your question above. I didn't think you were but maybe you are just that stupid.

You can keep asking it as much as you wish

[Cooper]

Could be suggested that the body line tactics used by England were cowardly as they had to attack the player and not play the game. Probably knew they'd struggle to win without those tactics.

Could be suggested, would be wrong though. Aussies also know this as they laud similar tactics now. Leg Theory was actually used first by an australian side. Strange the aussies don't know about that one.

Yeah nah it's right the English were cowards its a fact cause I said so

[C U Next Saturday]

Could be suggested that the body line tactics used by England were cowardly as they had to attack the player and not play the game. Probably knew they'd struggle to win without those tactics.

Could be suggested, would be wrong though. Aussies also know this as they laud similar tactics now. Leg Theory was actually used first by an australian side. Strange the aussies don't know about that one.

Warwick Armstrong 1903-04

[God is an Englishman]

Could be suggested that the body line tactics used by England were cowardly as they had to attack the player and not play the game. Probably knew they'd struggle to win without those tactics.

Could be suggested, would be wrong though. Aussies also know this as they laud similar tactics now. Leg Theory was actually used first by an australian side. Strange the aussies don't know about that one.

Warwick Armstrong 1903-04

Go to the top of the class. I'm impressed.

[Just Dave now]

no 1 batsman ever bradman , suck it up , for one who is all about stats and proof you cant beat 99.94 average now go play with the other cry babies in the yard

[God is an Englishman]

no 1 batsman ever bradman , suck it up , for one who is all about stats and proof you cant beat 99.94 average now go play with the other cry babies in the yard

Best batsman in the world facing medium pacers.

[Just Dave now]

no 1 batsman ever bradman , suck it up , for one who is all about stats and proof you cant beat 99.94 average now go play with the other cry babies in the yard

Best batsman in the world facing medium pacers.

dont belittle your bowlers of that era , im sure some of them were faster than medium

[N5 1BH]

The current South African pace attack is pretty good

[God is an Englishman]

no 1 batsman ever bradman , suck it up , for one who is all about stats and proof you cant beat 99.94 average now go play with the other cry babies in the yard

Best batsman in the world facing medium pacers.

dont belittle your bowlers of that era , im sure some of them were faster than medium

They were, and his average dropped when facing them.

[God is an Englishman]

Innings win, inside 3 days for England at the weekend.

[C U Next Saturday]

Happy 140th Anniversary on the day English cricket died

[Just Dave now]

no 1 batsman ever bradman , suck it up , for one who is all about stats and proof you cant beat 99.94 average now go play with the other cry babies in the yard

Best batsman in the world facing medium pacers.

dont belittle your bowlers of that era , im sure some of them were faster than medium

They were, and his average dropped when facing them.

yes so it was over 100 at one time and it dropped to 99.94 , brilliant !

[God is an Englishman]

no 1 batsman ever bradman , suck it up , for one who is all about stats and proof you cant beat 99.94 average now go play with the other cry babies in the yard

Best batsman in the world facing medium pacers.

dont belittle your bowlers of that era , im sure some of them were faster than medium

They were, and his average dropped when facing them.

yes so it was over 100 at one time and it dropped to 99.94 , brilliant !

His average nearly halved when facing genuine fast bowling.

[C U Next Saturday]

Bradmans test average was 111.92 when Bodyline started and 99.70 at the end of Bodyline

also, Larwood didnt play another test after Bodyline??? why

[God is an Englishman]

Bradmans test average was 111.92 when Bodyline started and 99.70 at the end of Bodyline

also, Larwood didnt play another test after Bodyline??? why

Bradman's average for the leg theory series was almost half his average at the time. He was found out.

Larwood didn't play again because the MCC asked him to apologise to the australians. He did nothing wrong so he refused to do so.

[Just Dave now]

Bradmans test average was 111.92 when Bodyline started and 99.70 at the end of Bodyline

also, Larwood didnt play another test after Bodyline??? why

Bradman's average for the leg theory series was almost half his average at the time. He was found out.

Larwood didn't play again because the MCC asked him to apologise to the australians. He did nothing wrong so he refused to do so.

oh so it was leg theory not quick bowling now , duck weave dodge . still scored plenty and mainly against the poms . and tell me why did they adopt such a theory ? cos they couldnt get him out and the only way to try something was to limit his scoring options

[C U Next Saturday]

Bradmans test average was 111.92 when Bodyline started and 99.70 at the end of Bodyline

also, Larwood didnt play another test after Bodyline??? why

Bradman's average for the leg theory series was almost half his average at the time. He was found out.

Larwood didn't play again because the MCC asked him to apologise to the australians. He did nothing wrong so he refused to do so.

wasn't the reason he quit was

He was disillusioned and confused. Exhausted after the tour, nursing serious injuries and haggling with the tight-fisted MCC to cough up the money for treatment,

Even the English did not spare him, disowning him and questioning his motives, tactics and spirit with in the game.....

[God is an Englishman]

Bradmans test average was 111.92 when Bodyline started and 99.70 at the end of Bodyline

also, Larwood didnt play another test after Bodyline??? why

Bradman's average for the leg theory series was almost half his average at the time. He was found out.

Larwood didn't play again because the MCC asked him to apologise to the australians. He did nothing wrong so he refused to do so.

wasn't the reason he quit was

He was disillusioned and confused. Exhausted after the tour, nursing serious injuries and haggling with the tight-fisted MCC to cough up the money for treatment,

Even the English did not spare him, disowning him and questioning his motives, tactics and spirit with in the game.....

No, it was the reason I said above.

[C U Next Saturday]

Bradmans test average was 111.92 when Bodyline started and 99.70 at the end of Bodyline

also, Larwood didnt play another test after Bodyline??? why

Bradman's average for the leg theory series was almost half his average at the time. He was found out.

Larwood didn't play again because the MCC asked him to apologise to the australians. He did nothing wrong so he refused to do so.

wasn't the reason he quit was

He was disillusioned and confused. Exhausted after the tour, nursing serious injuries and haggling with the tight-fisted MCC to cough up the money for treatment,

Even the English did not spare him, disowning him and questioning his motives, tactics and spirit with in the game.....

No, it was the reason I said above.

so what I said was 100% incorrect ?

[God is an Englishman]

Bradmans test average was 111.92 when Bodyline started and 99.70 at the end of Bodyline

also, Larwood didnt play another test after Bodyline??? why

Bradman's average for the leg theory series was almost half his average at the time. He was found out.

Larwood didn't play again because the MCC asked him to apologise to the australians. He did nothing wrong so he refused to do so.

wasn't the reason he quit was

He was disillusioned and confused. Exhausted after the tour, nursing serious injuries and haggling with the tight-fisted MCC to cough up the money for treatment,

Even the English did not spare him, disowning him and questioning his motives, tactics and spirit with in the game.....

No, it was the reason I said above.

so what I said was 100% incorrect ?

He may have been feeling like that and he certainly felt overworked but the reason he didn't play for England again was for the reason I said above.

[C U Next Saturday]

it was one of the reasons as well as I what I mentioned
thought you knew your cricket

[God is an Englishman]

it was one of the reasons as well as I what I mentioned
thought you knew your cricket

No it wasn't.

[C U Next Saturday]

why would Larwood need to apologise to New Zealand, India and West Indies as England played them before playing Australia since Bodyline and as you said " Larwood refused to apologise to the Australians "

[God is an Englishman]

why would Larwood need to apologise to New Zealand, India and West Indies as England played them before playing Australia since Bodyline and as you said " Larwood refused to apologise to the Australians "

He never bowled fast leg theory to them.