Results 5/9
Moderators: BillShankly, John Cena, swannsong, Forum Admins
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Results 5/9
C's: Stirling 0 Jets 5
B's: Stirling 3 Jets 3
Home ref keeping them in it
A's: Stirling 0 Jets 10
Jets totally dominant and should have won by more but for the ref and the dirty play by the Stirling sweeper.
B's: Stirling 3 Jets 3
Home ref keeping them in it
A's: Stirling 0 Jets 10
Jets totally dominant and should have won by more but for the ref and the dirty play by the Stirling sweeper.
- Lucas Leiva
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2126
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:32 am
Re: Results 5/9
A: Cobras 2 VFC 1
B: Cobras 0 VFC 0
C: Cobras 3 VFC 0
Missed a pen and hit the bar in the last 5 min, Cobras escape jaws of death.
B: Cobras 0 VFC 0
C: Cobras 3 VFC 0
Missed a pen and hit the bar in the last 5 min, Cobras escape jaws of death.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Results 5/9
A's: Stirling 2 Jets 2God is an Englishman wrote:C's: Stirling 0 Jets 5
B's: Stirling 3 Jets 3
Home ref keeping them in it
A's: Stirling 0 Jets 10
Jets totally dominant and should have won by more but for the ref and the dirty play by the Stirling sweeper.
- Moritaka Chisato
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 2:41 pm
Re: Results 5/9
I await otto's report.God is an Englishman wrote:A's: Stirling 0 Jets 10
Jets totally dominant and should have won by more but for the ref and the dirty play by the Stirling sweeper.
Who picks up guide dog's poo?
-
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 2:46 pm
- ʃₐᵇf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a)
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:12 pm
Re: Results 5/9
Not that it maters because of the move to feds but did you guys stay up?Lucas Leiva wrote:A: Cobras 2 VFC 1
B: Cobras 0 VFC 0
C: Cobras 3 VFC 0
Missed a pen and hit the bar in the last 5 min, Cobras escape jaws of death.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Results 5/9
Longest match report I've ever seen you give. Considering your inaccuracy I can see why you never (or at least very very very very very very rarely) do it.God is an Englishman wrote:C's: Stirling 0 Jets 5
B's: Stirling 3 Jets 3
Home ref keeping them in it
A's: Stirling 0 Jets 10
Jets totally dominant and should have won by more but for the ref and the dirty play by the Stirling sweeper.
Stirling District (est 1967) 32 seasons successfully avoiding a Championship then this
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Results 5/9
Score aside I thought I was pretty accurate.otto62 wrote:Longest match report I've ever seen you give. Considering your inaccuracy I can see why you never (or at least very very very very very very rarely) do it.God is an Englishman wrote:C's: Stirling 0 Jets 5
B's: Stirling 3 Jets 3
Home ref keeping them in it
A's: Stirling 0 Jets 10
Jets totally dominant and should have won by more but for the ref and the dirty play by the Stirling sweeper.
I also don't bother with match reports as who gives a cabernet, people just want to know the scores.
At least you've learnt another lesson.
Re: Results 5/9
Yes. Your match reports are cabernet.God is an Englishman wrote:Score aside I thought I was pretty accurate.otto62 wrote:Longest match report I've ever seen you give. Considering your inaccuracy I can see why you never (or at least very very very very very very rarely) do it.God is an Englishman wrote:C's: Stirling 0 Jets 5
B's: Stirling 3 Jets 3
Home ref keeping them in it
A's: Stirling 0 Jets 10
Jets totally dominant and should have won by more but for the ref and the dirty play by the Stirling sweeper.
I also don't bother with match reports as who gives a cabernet, people just want to know the scores.
At least you've learnt another lesson.
And a point of clarification ... SOME people just want to know the scores ... other people are interested in hearing more.
Stirling District (est 1967) 32 seasons successfully avoiding a Championship then this
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1269
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:55 pm
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Results 5/9
Then as I said last time, put up your own match report that shows me I was wrong. Or is it like last time when you then ran away as you knew you weren't even at the game so had to go quiet.otto62 wrote: Yes. Your match reports are cabernet.
And a point of clarification ... SOME people just want to know the scores ... other people are interested in hearing more.
If you think people want to read your match reports then keep putting them up, especially enjoy you weren't even at the game.
Re: Results 5/9
Oh my. Oh, I feel really told off now.God is an Englishman wrote:Then as I said last time, put up your own match report that shows me I was wrong. Or is it like last time when you then ran away as you knew you weren't even at the game so had to go quiet.otto62 wrote: Yes. Your match reports are cabernet.
And a point of clarification ... SOME people just want to know the scores ... other people are interested in hearing more.
If you think people want to read your match reports then keep putting them up, especially enjoy you weren't even at the game.
Interesting that you stand by your 0-10 match report. Are you that deluded?
FYI, I don't know if people want to read my match reports or not, I only put them up in the hope others might do the same, because I like reading their match reports. It worked in your case, but you are a special case. And don't worry that your match report was rubbish, you can only get better from here.
Stirling District (est 1967) 32 seasons successfully avoiding a Championship then this
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:00 pm
Re: Results 5/9
Adelaide Uni v Adelaide Villa
A 0-2
B 6-2
C 4-0
Ripper game v Saints (2-1) over Wanderers at Rushworth next week!
A 0-2
B 6-2
C 4-0
Ripper game v Saints (2-1) over Wanderers at Rushworth next week!
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 10:09 am
Re: Results 5/9
DIV 3
Prince Alfred 2 Murray Bridge 0
Prince Alfred 1 Murray Bridge 0
Arbe 4 Hahndorf 3
Arbe 2 Hahndorf 0 Forfeit
One Tree Hill 3 Mclaren 2
One Tree Hill 1 Mclaren 5
Breakers 0 Torrens Valley 0
Breakers 0 Torrens Valley 3
Adelaide Uni 2 Cove 5
Adelaide Uni 1 Cove 0
Prince Alfred 2 Murray Bridge 0
Prince Alfred 1 Murray Bridge 0
Arbe 4 Hahndorf 3
Arbe 2 Hahndorf 0 Forfeit
One Tree Hill 3 Mclaren 2
One Tree Hill 1 Mclaren 5
Breakers 0 Torrens Valley 0
Breakers 0 Torrens Valley 3
Adelaide Uni 2 Cove 5
Adelaide Uni 1 Cove 0
- Lucas Leiva
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2126
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:32 am
Re: Results 5/9
Will still have a team next year in SAASL, but we saved our bacon a few weeks agoSteve#4 wrote:Not that it maters because of the move to feds but did you guys stay up?Lucas Leiva wrote:A: Cobras 2 VFC 1
B: Cobras 0 VFC 0
C: Cobras 3 VFC 0
Missed a pen and hit the bar in the last 5 min, Cobras escape jaws of death.
- ʃₐᵇf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a)
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:12 pm
Re: Results 5/9
Knew that but wont be in div 2, this is what i meant by "not that it matters".Lucas Leiva wrote:Will still have a team next year in SAASL, but we saved our bacon a few weeks agoSteve#4 wrote:Not that it maters because of the move to feds but did you guys stay up?Lucas Leiva wrote:A: Cobras 2 VFC 1
B: Cobras 0 VFC 0
C: Cobras 3 VFC 0
Missed a pen and hit the bar in the last 5 min, Cobras escape jaws of death.
I think most of the fed guys don't realise the toughness of Div 2 let alone premier.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Results 5/9
motto62 wrote:Oh my. Oh, I feel really told off now.God is an Englishman wrote:Then as I said last time, put up your own match report that shows me I was wrong. Or is it like last time when you then ran away as you knew you weren't even at the game so had to go quiet.otto62 wrote: Yes. Your match reports are cabernet.
And a point of clarification ... SOME people just want to know the scores ... other people are interested in hearing more.
If you think people want to read your match reports then keep putting them up, especially enjoy you weren't even at the game.
Interesting that you stand by your 0-10 match report. Are you that deluded?
FYI, I don't know if people want to read my match reports or not, I only put them up in the hope others might do the same, because I like reading their match reports. It worked in your case, but you are a special case. And don't worry that your match report was rubbish, you can only get better from here.
1. I said the results aside
2. Better than your match report, were you even there?
-
- Ball Boy
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 3:13 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: Results 5/9
Why wouldn't Vipers still be in Div 2 next season?Steve#4 wrote:
Knew that but wont be in div 2, this is what i meant by "not that it matters".
I think most of the fed guys don't realise the toughness of Div 2 let alone premier.
Re: Results 5/9
Player numbers, it is only an educated guess but i would think they will haveSoccerBoii wrote:Why wouldn't Vipers still be in Div 2 next season?Steve#4 wrote:
Knew that but wont be in div 2, this is what i meant by "not that it matters".
I think most of the fed guys don't realise the toughness of Div 2 let alone premier.
A single team in div5.
Re: Results 5/9
I suppose in your mind the result is probably just a minor detail.God is an Englishman wrote:m
1. I said the results aside
2. Better than your match report, were you even there?
Would you make up your mind if you want me to give a match report or not? Which is it? I know you're quite changeable, but could you please pick one and stick with it.
Stirling District (est 1967) 32 seasons successfully avoiding a Championship then this
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
- ʃₐᵇf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a)
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:12 pm
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Results 5/9
I couldn't give a cabernet if you post one or not. However, if you're going to claim my match report is wrong, show where it's wrong. A bit like the last game when you claimed it was wrong and you weren't even there.otto62 wrote:I suppose in your mind the result is probably just a minor detail.God is an Englishman wrote:m
1. I said the results aside
2. Better than your match report, were you even there?
Would you make up your mind if you want me to give a match report or not? Which is it? I know you're quite changeable, but could you please pick one and stick with it.
Re: Results 5/9
You're certainly giving a good impression of caring. But, since you don't care, I won't.God is an Englishman wrote:I couldn't give a cabernet if you post one or not. However, if you're going to claim my match report is wrong, show where it's wrong. A bit like the last game when you claimed it was wrong and you weren't even there.otto62 wrote:I suppose in your mind the result is probably just a minor detail.God is an Englishman wrote:m
1. I said the results aside
2. Better than your match report, were you even there?
Would you make up your mind if you want me to give a match report or not? Which is it? I know you're quite changeable, but could you please pick one and stick with it.
Stirling District (est 1967) 32 seasons successfully avoiding a Championship then this
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
Re: Results 5/9
That's nice. It seems the question of whether anyone is interested in reading my match reports has been answered.ʃₐᵇf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a) wrote:The fourth post in this thread wants your report.
Stirling District (est 1967) 32 seasons successfully avoiding a Championship then this
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
1999 Div 2 Champions
2002 Div 2 & 2B
2004 Div 1 & Champion of Champions
2007 Div 1 & 1B
2009 Div 1B
2011 Div 1B
2013 Div 2B & 7C
2014 Div 2B
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Results 5/9
Let's see if you stick to it, especially on games you weren't even at.otto62 wrote: You're certainly giving a good impression of caring. But, since you don't care, I won't.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Results 5/9
otto62 wrote:That's nice. It seems the question of whether anyone is interested in reading my match reports has been answered.ʃₐᵇf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a) wrote:The fourth post in this thread wants your report.
The gift that keeps on giving