Page 2 of 2

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 1:12 pm
by eagleboy
Bomber wrote:Foreign language, that's a laugh. Most haven't a clue about English anyway, so anything else wouldn't be much different.
:lol:

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:32 am
by ozzie owl
Bomber wrote:Foreign language, that's a laugh. Most haven't a clue about English anyway, so anything else wouldn't be much different.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 4:00 pm
by Sushi
Bomber wrote:Foreign language, that's a laugh. Most haven't a clue about English anyway, so anything else wouldn't be much different.
:) :) :) :) :)

1,3,5, get yourselves a room

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 6:23 pm
by eagleboy
Migrant Land wrote:
Bomber wrote:Foreign language, that's a laugh. Most haven't a clue about English anyway, so anything else wouldn't be much different.
:) :) :) :) :)

1,3,5, get yourselves a room

:?: https://translate.google.com/

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 9:30 pm
by ozzie owl
Score prediction

Aus 4 Jamaica 0

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 6:01 am
by Eyas
That won't happen.

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 6:55 am
by GaylyColouredStumps
ozzie owl wrote:
Stitch This wrote:Migrant Land, Grosso, zzz, cornetto

A bunch of misogynist faaaarken immigrants that can't assimilate.


If you don't like it, leave!
If someone lives in Australia and they hate everything about it so much , there is a very simple solution.
Stay and try to improve things?

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:10 pm
by Grosso Mk II
Grosso Mk II wrote:
Stitch This wrote:Migrant Land, Grosso, zzz, cornetto

A bunch of misogynist faaaarken immigrants that can't assimilate.

If you don't like it, leave!
evidence of 'misogyny' leftist?
...

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 7:28 am
by Sushi
Migrant Land wrote:The Geniuses at the FFA who know fkall get what they deserve.
You're next Greg the dog
You've left the room

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 7:32 am
by Sushi
ozzie owl wrote:Quiet this morning Migrant Land ?
No, just woken up to what I expected.
Been a good start to the day.
Suck on this .
Kerr can score 100 goals against pw opposition, but when it counts...

Well done FFA .
Great job too

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 3:07 pm
by Grosso Mk II
lost to a bunch of cross country skiers and canoeists :lol:

cue the media and all the SJW sycophants telling us about the Aussie never say die attitude :lol:

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 5:28 pm
by Scholes
Weren't the aussies "brave" though?

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 11:50 pm
by Sushi
B.Toomer wrote:Weren't the aussies "brave" though?
Oh yes , notice the pattern every time the Matildos or socceroos get eliminated :

'Brave'
'Unlucky'
'Heartbreaking'
'Referee cost them'
'Not quite good enough'
'Falling behind in player development'
'FFSA needs to get serious about development'

And this exit was their worst ever at a World Cup.


And yet the overpaid,under-knowledged fat cat administrators continue on their merry way , with another junket just around the corner.

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 9:54 am
by eagleboy
Migrant Land wrote:
B.Toomer wrote:Weren't the aussies "brave" though?
Oh yes , notice the pattern every time the Matildos or socceroos get eliminated :

'Brave'
'Unlucky'
'Heartbreaking'
'Referee cost them'
'Not quite good enough'
'Falling behind in player development'
'FFSA needs to get serious about development'

And this exit was their worst ever at a World Cup.


And yet the overpaid,under-knowledged fat cat administrators continue on their merry way , with another junket just around the corner.

Good list of excuse but having the FFA behind you is like having a millstone round your neck.Like mentioned in other posts the board should resign.
Loosing in a penalty kickoff is not a disgrace, maybe a tragedy. Ask Italy and England on a few occasions.
The Ref and VAR made a few interesting decisions but this world cup is being made to look ridiculous owing to many strange calls.
Also, I don't think the coach had any real clues. Just my opinion.

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 10:06 am
by Eyas
eagleboy wrote:The Ref and VAR made a few interesting decisions
Such as...

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 10:41 am
by ozzie owl
Migrant Land wrote:
B.Toomer wrote:Weren't the aussies "brave" though?
Oh yes , notice the pattern every time the Matildos or socceroos get eliminated :

'Brave'
'Unlucky'
'Heartbreaking'
'Referee cost them'
'Not quite good enough'
'Falling behind in player development'
'FFSA needs to get serious about development'

And this exit was their worst ever at a World Cup.


And yet the overpaid,under-knowledged fat cat administrators continue on their merry way , with another junket just around the corner.
Whenever England failed in the big tournaments these were often trotted out:

'Brave'
'Unlucky'
'Heartbreaking'
'Referee cost them'
'Not quite good enough'
'Falling behind in player development'
'FA needs to get serious about development'

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:05 am
by Scholes
As usual you're wrong. The British press usually use number 4 & number 6. They generally go overboard to criticize our teams, unlike the aussie press who trot out lame excuses.

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 1:24 pm
by eagleboy
Eyjafjallajökull wrote:
eagleboy wrote:The Ref and VAR made a few interesting decisions
Such as...
you not see the game?


1.penalty overturned. I thought the rule was clear and obvious mistake.
2. clear handball in 1/2 half
3. bad tackle on aussie girl
4. send off was dubious imho . doubt if was even a free.

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:09 pm
by Eyas
1. I'm not a fan of VAR and would rather the referee stick to their decision (even if it was wrong like this one, never a penalty). That said it wouldn't have changed the game as we saw how aussies take penalties.

2. Clear handball, but again we saw how aussies take penalties.

3. Might have missed that one.

4. How was that not a foul? It's a clear shirt pull. There's no way you can accidentally grab an opponent's shirt. It's a deliberate action and cheating. Should be a red card anywhere on the pitch. You can't cry because you got caught cheating.

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 3:15 pm
by Grosso Mk II
No problems they'll learn from this and come back stronger for pointless friendlies :lol:

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 4:45 pm
by eagleboy
Eyjafjallajökull wrote:
4. How was that not a foul? It's a clear shirt pull. There's no way you can accidentally grab an opponent's shirt. It's a deliberate action and cheating. Should be a red card anywhere on the pitch. You can't cry because you got caught cheating.
A shirt pull should be a red card anywhere on the pitch, really. You wouldn't have any players left at the end of the game.

In the case as mentioned, both player were holding/pushing. Goal scoring opportunity that far out is questionable. Free to either player would be reasonable result.

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 5:16 pm
by Inoue Waka
eagleboy wrote:A shirt pull should be a red card anywhere on the pitch, really. You wouldn't have any players left at the end of the game.
Or perhaps players will curb their actions. Can you name an instance where pulling your opponent's shirt is justified?

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 6:27 am
by Eyas
eagleboy wrote:In the case as mentioned, both player were holding/pushing.
I only saw one player grab a shirt.

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 7:49 am
by eagleboy
Eyjafjallajökull wrote:
eagleboy wrote:In the case as mentioned, both player were holding/pushing.
I only saw one player grab a shirt.
OPSM can help :D

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 8:41 am
by In the way
Eyjafjallajökull wrote:
eagleboy wrote:In the case as mentioned, both player were holding/pushing.
I only saw one player grab a shirt.
Sad thing is she didnt need to
Agree - she ( Kennedy ) was skinned several times by the pace of young Norway strikers, lucky our keeper pulled off some good saves.
Var clearly showed one player grabbing pulling shirt, even commentators said that is at least a yellow.

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2019 10:42 am
by ozzie owl
Grosso Mk II wrote:lost to a bunch of cross country skiers and canoeists :lol:

cue the media and all the SJW sycophants telling us about the Aussie never say die attitude :lol:
Scores from overnight Grosso ?

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2019 1:02 pm
by Old Master
The blame for the Matilda's downfall is not the fault of the Referee or match officials, or even the players and coaches, it is entirely due to the FFA Board and their constant Interference in team affairs of every national squad.

Their continual interference and efforts to destabilise the players caused the national Men's Coach, Ange Postecoglu to resign just three months before the World Cup and look what happened then - another monumental failure.

They sacked Stajic and didn't have the guts to say why, other than making mealy mouth statements and refusing to discuss their reasoning - same result.

As I've said before, the FFA receives a lot of funding from the Federal and State governments, that's the Taxpayers, me and you and we have a right to be informed of what the F52k is going on - a Royal Commission must be mounted to investigate the actions and reasoning of the FFA and the State Associations and why they always manage to seize defeat from the Jaws of Victory. :idea:

Re: Matildos not as good as they thought

Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2019 1:26 pm
by eagleboy
Old Master wrote:The blame for the Matilda's downfall is not the fault of the Referee or match officials, or even the players and coaches, it is entirely due to the FFA Board and their constant Interference in team affairs of every national squad.

Their continual interference and efforts to destabilise the players caused the national Men's Coach, Ange Postecoglu to resign just three months before the World Cup and look what happened then - another monumental failure.

They sacked Stajic and didn't have the guts to say why, other than making mealy mouth statements and refusing to discuss their reasoning - same result.

As I've said before, the FFA receives a lot of funding from the Federal and State governments, that's the Taxpayers, me and you and we have a right to be informed of what the F52k is going on - a Royal Commission must be mounted to investigate the actions and reasoning of the FFA and the State Associations and why they always manage to seize defeat from the Jaws of Victory. :idea:
Probably hit the mark OM.Royal commission may be a bit overboard but some open to public investigation is required. How much taxpayer money is going to salaries of all the do gooders and hangers-on people in there for the wrong reasons. Probably stopping funds being diverted to grass roots.
Ill throw in the SMA costs always increasing. Managers on fat pay packets.