I assume he got away with that, should have been a booking.
A booking? Look at it again- how anybody can say big Harry deserves to stay on the park after a tackle like that is beyond me? It ticks all the boxes for a serious foul play offence. I would be interested to know why you think a yellow card only?
Studs were down which saves him for me.
Clumsy - yes, mistimed - yes, a strikers tackle -yes.
I assume he got away with that, should have been a booking.
A booking? Look at it again- how anybody can say big Harry deserves to stay on the park after a tackle like that is beyond me? It ticks all the boxes for a serious foul play offence. I would be interested to know why you think a yellow card only?
Studs were down which saves him for me.
Clumsy - yes, mistimed - yes, a strikers tackle -yes.
That's a booking. It's not netball.
stamping = red card? studs down can be a red.
A striker's tackle? Where in the laws of the game does it differentiate?
I assume he got away with that, should have been a booking.
A booking? Look at it again- how anybody can say big Harry deserves to stay on the park after a tackle like that is beyond me? It ticks all the boxes for a serious foul play offence. I would be interested to know why you think a yellow card only?
Studs were down which saves him for me.
Clumsy - yes, mistimed - yes, a strikers tackle -yes.
That's a booking. It's not netball.
stamping = red card? studs down can be a red.
A striker's tackle? Where in the laws of the game does it differentiate?
It’s an actual condition
Athletes foot
Tennis elbow
Strikers tackle
Your husband talks shît
These users thanked the author Sunny Vanilla for the post:
Old Master, johndedes, theorakle, ozzie owl, suzie, thewabster, Za Dom Spremni
I assume he got away with that, should have been a booking.
A booking? Look at it again- how anybody can say big Harry deserves to stay on the park after a tackle like that is beyond me? It ticks all the boxes for a serious foul play offence. I would be interested to know why you think a yellow card only?
Studs were down which saves him for me.
Clumsy - yes, mistimed - yes, a strikers tackle -yes.
That's a booking. It's not netball.
stamping = red card? studs down can be a red.
A striker's tackle? Where in the laws of the game does it differentiate?
It wasn't a stamp though.
Yes, it was a strikers tackle. I don't believe I said it does differentiate. Same as it doesn't differentiate over clumsy or mistimed.
I assume he got away with that, should have been a booking.
A booking? Look at it again- how anybody can say big Harry deserves to stay on the park after a tackle like that is beyond me? It ticks all the boxes for a serious foul play offence. I would be interested to know why you think a yellow card only?
Studs were down which saves him for me.
Clumsy - yes, mistimed - yes, a strikers tackle -yes.
That's a booking. It's not netball.
stamping = red card? studs down can be a red.
A striker's tackle? Where in the laws of the game does it differentiate?
I assume he got away with that, should have been a booking.
A booking? Look at it again- how anybody can say big Harry deserves to stay on the park after a tackle like that is beyond me? It ticks all the boxes for a serious foul play offence. I would be interested to know why you think a yellow card only?
Studs were down which saves him for me.
Clumsy - yes, mistimed - yes, a strikers tackle -yes.
That's a booking. It's not netball.
stamping = red card? studs down can be a red.
A striker's tackle? Where in the laws of the game does it differentiate?
It wasn't a stamp though.
Yes, it was a strikers tackle. I don't believe I said it does differentiate. Same as it doesn't differentiate over clumsy or mistimed.
My point was studs down can be a send off - I wasn't accusing you of saying it was a stamp.
So why mention it was a strikers tackle if it doesn't differentiate? No need for that description, as a ref should not care where or who makes the challenge
I assume he got away with that, should have been a booking.
A booking? Look at it again- how anybody can say big Harry deserves to stay on the park after a tackle like that is beyond me? It ticks all the boxes for a serious foul play offence. I would be interested to know why you think a yellow card only?
Studs were down which saves him for me.
Clumsy - yes, mistimed - yes, a strikers tackle -yes.
That's a booking. It's not netball.
stamping = red card? studs down can be a red.
A striker's tackle? Where in the laws of the game does it differentiate?
I assume he got away with that, should have been a booking.
A booking? Look at it again- how anybody can say big Harry deserves to stay on the park after a tackle like that is beyond me? It ticks all the boxes for a serious foul play offence. I would be interested to know why you think a yellow card only?
Studs were down which saves him for me.
Clumsy - yes, mistimed - yes, a strikers tackle -yes.
That's a booking. It's not netball.
stamping = red card? studs down can be a red.
A striker's tackle? Where in the laws of the game does it differentiate?
It wasn't a stamp though.
Yes, it was a strikers tackle. I don't believe I said it does differentiate. Same as it doesn't differentiate over clumsy or mistimed.
My point was studs down can be a send off - I wasn't accusing you of saying it was a stamp.
So why mention it was a strikers tackle if it doesn't differentiate? No need for that description, as a ref should not care where or who makes the challenge
Because it sums up the challenge perfectly. Clumsy and mistimed, not malicious.
I assume he got away with that, should have been a booking.
A booking? Look at it again- how anybody can say big Harry deserves to stay on the park after a tackle like that is beyond me? It ticks all the boxes for a serious foul play offence. I would be interested to know why you think a yellow card only?
Studs were down which saves him for me.
Clumsy - yes, mistimed - yes, a strikers tackle -yes.
That's a booking. It's not netball.
stamping = red card? studs down can be a red.
A striker's tackle? Where in the laws of the game does it differentiate?
It’s an actual condition
Athletes foot
Tennis elbow
Strikers tackle
Your husband talks shît
Who is his husband?
you would be as you wear the pants , not sure that vicky has any
I may not be perfect but I'm still the closest I have ever come across
A booking? Look at it again- how anybody can say big Harry deserves to stay on the park after a tackle like that is beyond me? It ticks all the boxes for a serious foul play offence. I would be interested to know why you think a yellow card only?
Studs were down which saves him for me.
Clumsy - yes, mistimed - yes, a strikers tackle -yes.
That's a booking. It's not netball.
stamping = red card? studs down can be a red.
A striker's tackle? Where in the laws of the game does it differentiate?
It wasn't a stamp though.
Yes, it was a strikers tackle. I don't believe I said it does differentiate. Same as it doesn't differentiate over clumsy or mistimed.
My point was studs down can be a send off - I wasn't accusing you of saying it was a stamp.
So why mention it was a strikers tackle if it doesn't differentiate? No need for that description, as a ref should not care where or who makes the challenge
Because it sums up the challenge perfectly. Clumsy and mistimed, not malicious.
I believe you have your liverpool glasses on.
'Most' red cards for bad challenges are not malicious.
My Liverpool Glasses are on to neutralise your Millwall ones,
I thought GIAE might have used the 'forward's tackle' excuse- where in the LOTG does it say a forward gets away with a serious foul play offence by receiving a yellow and not a red?
Regardless of which team you support you should refrain from using bias one way or another. If Robertson had not lifted his foot and it remained planted his ankle would have been snapped. It matters not that it wasn't, this is a straight red in any League in the world.
I would bet that Kane himself was very surprised he wasn't sent-off for the challenge.
Clumsy - yes, mistimed - yes, a strikers tackle -yes.
That's a booking. It's not netball.
stamping = red card? studs down can be a red.
A striker's tackle? Where in the laws of the game does it differentiate?
It wasn't a stamp though.
Yes, it was a strikers tackle. I don't believe I said it does differentiate. Same as it doesn't differentiate over clumsy or mistimed.
My point was studs down can be a send off - I wasn't accusing you of saying it was a stamp.
So why mention it was a strikers tackle if it doesn't differentiate? No need for that description, as a ref should not care where or who makes the challenge
Because it sums up the challenge perfectly. Clumsy and mistimed, not malicious.
I believe you have your liverpool glasses on.
'Most' red cards for bad challenges are not malicious.
My Liverpool Glasses are on to neutralise your Millwall ones,
A striker's tackle? Where in the laws of the game does it differentiate?
It wasn't a stamp though.
Yes, it was a strikers tackle. I don't believe I said it does differentiate. Same as it doesn't differentiate over clumsy or mistimed.
My point was studs down can be a send off - I wasn't accusing you of saying it was a stamp.
So why mention it was a strikers tackle if it doesn't differentiate? No need for that description, as a ref should not care where or who makes the challenge
Because it sums up the challenge perfectly. Clumsy and mistimed, not malicious.
I believe you have your liverpool glasses on.
'Most' red cards for bad challenges are not malicious.
My Liverpool Glasses are on to neutralise your Millwall ones,
He doesn't play for Millwall.
But he did, so it is possible you will defend him more than someone who has no positive association with them.
Yes, it was a strikers tackle. I don't believe I said it does differentiate. Same as it doesn't differentiate over clumsy or mistimed.
My point was studs down can be a send off - I wasn't accusing you of saying it was a stamp.
So why mention it was a strikers tackle if it doesn't differentiate? No need for that description, as a ref should not care where or who makes the challenge
Because it sums up the challenge perfectly. Clumsy and mistimed, not malicious.
I believe you have your liverpool glasses on.
'Most' red cards for bad challenges are not malicious.
My Liverpool Glasses are on to neutralise your Millwall ones,
He doesn't play for Millwall.
But he did, so it is possible you will defend him more than someone who has no positive association with them.
Arena Oaxaca wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 4:37 pm
Look at how giae nicely explains things to his wife/girlfriend/partner, whereas he plays the stupid never ending question game with anyone else.
This really is true love he really does love her
I always find he answers questions when clearly asked. It's the vagueness that causes any confusion.
I have never seen him talk to his (ex) wife, but he certainly wasn't being pleasnt about her whne she came up in conversation. As for GF/Partner I can't comment.
Arena Oaxaca wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 4:37 pm
Look at how giae nicely explains things to his wife/girlfriend/partner, whereas he plays the stupid never ending question game with anyone else.
This really is true love he really does love her
I always find he answers questions when clearly asked. It's the vagueness that causes any confusion.
OMG stop! You two are too frickin cute!!!
These users thanked the author Sunny Vanilla for the post:
Old Master, johndedes, theorakle, ozzie owl, suzie, thewabster, Za Dom Spremni
Arena Oaxaca wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 4:37 pm
Look at how giae nicely explains things to his wife/girlfriend/partner, whereas he plays the stupid never ending question game with anyone else.
This really is true love he really does love her
I only play the "never ending question game" with people who don't answer. You all know you can end the game by simply answering.
If you were all confident you would answer and prove you're right. Most don't answer because the answers show them up.
As for my girlfriend. How do you know what games I play with her? Are you obsessed with me like Cooper is?
thebeautifulgame wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 3:46 pmIf Robertson had not lifted his foot and it remained planted his ankle would have been snapped.
Thank you Nostradamus
Absolute bollocks though, there were tackles worse than that in pretty much every game years ago and there weren't snapped ankles in every game. You should get a gig for one of the comics that pass themselves off as newspapers, making up sensationalist headlines.
Victor Meldrew wrote:A decent govt..... like uk.
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
thebeautifulgame wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 3:46 pmIf Robertson had not lifted his foot and it remained planted his ankle would have been snapped.
Thank you Nostradamus
Absolute bollocks though, there were tackles worse than that in pretty much every game years ago and there weren't snapped ankles in every game. You should get a gig for one of the comics that pass themselves off as newspapers, making up sensationalist headlines.
Jesus- I think I have hit a nerve! Is it because I have been picking on big Harry or perhaps backing Southgate?
Either way I stick by my opinions as we are all entitled to have our say- disagreeing used to be called a healthy debate.
Now it seems people love to put others down on a forum with cheap sarcasm.
Forgive me for speaking my mind.
thebeautifulgame wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 3:46 pmIf Robertson had not lifted his foot and it remained planted his ankle would have been snapped.
Thank you Nostradamus
Absolute bollocks though, there were tackles worse than that in pretty much every game years ago and there weren't snapped ankles in every game. You should get a gig for one of the comics that pass themselves off as newspapers, making up sensationalist headlines.
Jesus- I think I have hit a nerve! Is it because I have been picking on big Harry or perhaps backing Southgate?
Either way I stick by my opinions as we are all entitled to have our say- disagreeing used to be called a healthy debate.
Now it seems people love to put others down on a forum with cheap sarcasm.
Forgive me for speaking my mind.
Nothing to forgive, but your comment was all ifs, buts and maybes, I simply called it for what it was. Is it because Robbo is a Scot?
Last edited by Nice One Cyril on Wed Dec 21, 2022 6:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Victor Meldrew wrote:A decent govt..... like uk.
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
Victor Meldrew wrote: ↑Tue Dec 20, 2022 10:33 pm
Years ago your mob won trophies - things change..
You again show you are mr no nothing and ridiculously out of touch.
You're very close to being taken off my Christmas card list.
Victor Meldrew wrote:A decent govt..... like uk.
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
he really does love her 
